What would you say
if you were told that airplanes were regularly spraying toxic aerosols in the
skies above every major region of the world? That is exactly what a group of
protestors were claiming outside of the annual American Association for the
Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting that was held in San Diego from February
18-22. However, inside the convention center was a different story. The
scientists gathered to discuss the “plausibility” of implementing various
Geo-engineering campaigns throughout the world, all under the guise that the
Earth has a man-made global warming problem that can be solved in-part by
spraying aerosol aluminum and other particles into the sky to block the sun.
When these scientists were asked about the possibility of existing aerosol
programs; they stated that no aerosol spraying programs have been implemented to
date. A little confused? Why would protestors gather outside of a meeting making
claims that world-wide aerosol programs were under way if scientist were only
now discussing the possibility of implementing these programs? Could it be that
one of these groups is being deceived?
Mauro Oliveira, the
Webmaster of Geoengineeringwatch.org, was one of the protestors. He claimed that
the program for Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-engineering (SAG), AKA chemtrails, has
been well under way around the world. As a matter of fact, Oliveira stated that
witnesses from around the globe claim that heavy aerosol spraying is occurring
almost every day over just about every city. He went on to explain the
difference between a contrail and a chemtrail. He stated that when a jet
airplane flies at a certain altitude, a visible trail of streaks of condensed
water vapor sometimes form in the wake of the aircraft. This is called a
contrail. Contrails are normal and usually dissipate in a few seconds. They are
very similar to when we breathe in cold weather. According to Oliveira, what
occurs behind a SAG plane spraying aerosols is quite different. What can be seen
is a thick white line also called a chemtrail that lingers in the sky for
several hours. The SAG lines are sprayed into the upper atmosphere and then
spread out forming what then appear to be clouds. The particles from these
aerosols then fall to the ground where they enter our soil and water and can
also be inhaled.
Another group of
protestors had traveled over 10 hours from a small Shasta County community in
Northern California. They became concerned about SAG when many from this
community began to see dramatic changes not only in the sky, but also on the
ground. Trees were dying, grass was not growing and many farmers were having
difficulty getting any crops to grow on their farms. The crisis prompted
biologists from the community to take action by testing the soil. The results
were shocking. Aluminum, barium and other elements were found to be up to
thousands of times higher than normal limits. Such high quantities lead to
unhealthy PH levels in the soil which can be deadly to ecological life systems.
These shocking results led to additional testing of Lake Shasta with samples
from the Pit River arm tributary that tested over 4,610 times the maximum
contamination level of aluminum allowed in drinking water in the state of
California. Also, peer reviewed scientific studies conclude that bio-available
aluminum, now found in huge quantities in rain world-wide, is very harmful to
flora and thus the eco-system. Ironically, these are the same substances the
scientists are considering implementing in the various potential “future”
aerosol spraying campaigns that were being discussed at the meeting.
A large number of
other protesters became interested in SAG after experiencing burning eyes,
migraine headaches, anxiety, irregular heartbeat, high blood pressure and other
health problems on days that airplanes were allegedly witnessed spraying
aerosols in the sky. Deborah Whitman, Founder and President of the non-profit
environmental organization Environmental Voices and also Producer of the
documentary “Sky Lines” is no stranger to these symptoms. She has been
hospitalized over 51 times on what she calls “heavy spraying days”. Whitman has
committed her life to helping people who claim to be experiencing similar
problems resulting from aerosol spraying and gets calls from all over the U.S.
in response to her website and documentary. Her recommended health tips can be
found at www.environmentalvoices.org. Other indicators that possibly validate
the claim that SAG is connected to health problems are the respiratory mortality
rate, which has risen from eight on the list of mortality to third in the past
five years, and the fact that Alzheimer’s and other illnesses linked to aluminum
have continued to rise around the globe at astronomical rates since the
inception of the alleged spraying.
The AAAS meeting
hosted some of the world’s leading geo-engineering scientists. With years of
education and even more experience in their respected fields, the scientists
looked at geo-engineering issues from many angles. Workshop subjects ranged
from, the effectiveness of geo-engineering to potential problems and even
touched upon the issue of ethics. According to independent reporter Stewart Howe
of Los Angeles, all of the scientists seemed to be looking for solutions to what
they believe is the problem of global warming. Howe stated that the scientists
appeared to be carefully weighing both the pros and cons of SAG when presenting
potential campaigns to address the man-made global warming theory. Many were
actually advocating alternative methods to combat this issue due to the
potential risks of SAG that include droughts, ozone depletion, less solar power,
decimated weather patterns, military use of technology and other various
environmental impacts. Howe said, “after witnessing the aerosol spraying for
years, I was surprised by the discourse among scientists.” Stewart went on to
say that he believes that most of the scientists attending seemed to be
separated from the knowledge of any current SAG deployment. As a matter of fact
when asked about current SAG operations, leading geo-engineering scientist Ken
Caldiera replied that he was unaware of any current aerosol spraying operations
and when prompted to explain the long lingering trails left behind planes, he
stated that they are simply normal contrails from jets.
David Keith,
another leading scientist and expert in the field of geo-engineering, discussed
the well-funded studies that have been conducted to predict potential future
risks as well as benefits associated with geo-engineering. Some of the potential
benefits include a cooler planet, and the reduction of melting sea ice and
rising sea levels. Keith discussed what aerosol particles would be most
effective in achieving the stated goals of the SAG program. He went on to say
that initially sulfur was considered, however, aluminum is more effective and
can be used by adding ten to twenty mega-tons per year into the stratosphere.
When asked about health related studies that have been conducted to predict the
potential risks of adding the particles in our air, Keith stated that many
studies have been completed and indicate few risks. However, when asked
specifically about the use of aluminum as an aerosol, he said “we haven’t done
anything serious on aluminum, so there could be something terrible that we will
find tomorrow that we haven't looked at." After the meeting, Keith showed
consideration to the protesters by initiating a discussion about the SAG program
outside where the protestors were standing. When confronted with concerns about
SAG deployment from the group, he went on to say that he shared similar views
and is against any deployment until proper research is completed to determine
potential risks of aerosol spraying. He also went on to say that he is unaware
of any current SAG operations, but, would be willing to look at any scientific
proof if presented to him.
As the skies around our world continue to change, there is strong evidence that
points toward current deployment of massive aerosol operations. Could it be that
scientific data and studies are being used to implement pre-mature full-scale
SAG programs with-out the knowledge of the top scientists who are involved with
the research? If so, what kind of ethical considerations can we expect from the
geo-engineering community in the future? It is hard to believe that the strange
white lines in the skies witnessed around the world and the toxic elements found
in the soil, water and air are from an unrelated source. We the people, in
partnership with the scientific community need to challenge not only the
environmental and health risks associated with SAG but also the numerous
world-wide allegations about current deployment. It is imperative that we become
educated and involved in uncovering the truth of this alleged crime against both
nature and humanity. The future of our planet depends on it. As concerns
continue to grow around the world about this issue, additional information
including meet-up groups can be found on various chemtrail and geo-engineering
websites.